I have never really been a person who was heavily concerned
with the environment. I always understood that one day we will find out that we
severely damaged our planet and by then it will probably be too late. However,
I do understand that it is a very important issue and I found some of the facts
in this chapter to be really intriguing and some frightening. The fact that in
the past century we have quadrupled the amount of human beings is really a huge
number and has really had an impact on the earth. I always wondered why the
massive change in the environment has occurred rather recently instead of
before. One of the answers is the sheer number of people and the advanced
technology that allows us to alter the things around us. Strayer brought up an
interesting point when he said that the future generations may not remember the
wars, revolutions, and empires of this century, they may remember this time
period by the environment that has been left to them. From looking at two of
the charts one thing that really stood out was the fact that although the
United States only account for a few hundred million of the 7 billion people on
the earth, we produce almost a third of carbon dioxide emissions. That’s a huge
gap to account for and one can only imagine how other developed countries would
think of that. It really does not make sense for so much pollution to be caused
by relatively few people. It seems like the United States does not put much
effort in trying to save the environment, we just try to help defend forests
just so we do not feel too bad whereas other developing countries around the
world fight to save the environment because it is their livelihood. They need
the land for farming and herding so their struggle is often one for survival
while ours is to not feel so guilty. One concept that would be ideal to take up
is to move away from materialism and instead of appreciating the things we
make, appreciate the fragile web of life in nature that keeps us alive. I think
the idea talked about in the Philippines also makes a lot of sense. Sure it
makes sense to start a movement for the environment, however if you mix environmental
protest with other movements having them overlap, you can create a much larger
turn out and eventually change the established structures of power. Instead of
just having one group go out and protest you get numerous different groups for
different issues all showing up which could create a different end result to
the one that may occur if just one group showed up for one specific thing. I guess in the end the environment will become what we let it become, in the same way that our history is what people decided to let it be, the only question is what will we decide to do with it.
Thursday, April 18, 2013
Thursday, April 11, 2013
Chapter 24 pt 1
I found the beginning of the chapter to be the most
interesting part of the reading. Talking about how toys in different countries
are foreign both in look and also in nature and how it may not really make
sense to have Barbie and Ken in a Muslim society. The ideals they portray are
not necessarily common with the ideals in Muslim society. The irony is that the
thing they do share in common is that they were made in China. This story was
just about children’s toys but one could really expand upon that to extend it
to things beyond toys. It is weird today to think about the time where foreign
countries were exactly that, foreign. They were faraway places that if they did
not exist then you might not be impacted today. However, with the technology
today and because of globalization, it became really difficult not to become
dependent on everyone else, especially when so many different places have so
much to offer. I also found it interesting that they traced the roots of
globalization all the way back to trade routes like the Silk Road. It makes
more sense to talk about technology today being a source of all the
globalization, but even without the technology we were interacting and becoming
reliant upon others even hundreds of years ago. The thing that surprised me a
bit was the comparison of America to that of an empire. I never really thought
of it that way but I suppose that it does make a lot of sense. It is not so
much of a colonial empire, I mean obviously we are not taking over other
countries and populating them, rather we sort of influence their economy and
politics, a lot of times in a negative way. I thought it was funny that in
terms of American global economy and the cultural face of America they used
McDonalds as the example. I am not sure if that was just the easiest thing to
express it in but I for one think it is not great that the face of our country
is a fast food chain. The picture above the military bases in the early 21st
century and you cannot help but question the placement of some of the military
bases. For example countries like Greenland, Iceland, and New Zealand, what
exactly to we have to worry about from those countries? Or is there another reason
for them being there? I mean I don’t know but it is something I found strange. Unsurprisingly
however was the fact that globalization helped create the greatest spurt of
economic growth in history. It makes sense that if everyone is trading with
each other then they must all be getting something out of it, rather than
taking over places for the good of one country we began to trade and benefit
everyone.
Monday, April 1, 2013
Chapter 22
The second half of chapter 22 seemed like a disaster waiting
to happen. The brief alliances made in
World War II between the United States, Russia, and Britain to stop Germany worked
effectively in solving that problem but they were not necessarily good matches
for each other as Russia and the United States saw each other’s way of
governing was wrong. This was the cause of a bitter rivalry and division of all
of Europe and most of the world. Fortunately though, the battle that seemed
most imminent did not occur due to agreements made by JFK and the Soviet
leader. However all these threats and fragile relationships still ended up
having a huge impact in the form of the nuclear arms race. Though no one really
fought each other in the cold war, the arms race was definitely a huge result
which still today is a problem seeing as how we have enough bombs to blow up
the world 20 times over. I mean that sounds like a lot of power but what are we
going to do with the extra 19 when we destroy the world the first time. Nuclear
weapons have been a huge problem since the cold war because of Russia, and now
it is still a problem because of countries in the Middle East and North Korea
working on these things that could potentially destroy us. In America we seem
to think that we should be able to police the whole world and try to control
who should be able to have these globe changing weapons but the question is,
should ANYBODY have them at all? Furthermore, we have the expansion of military
bases throughout the world and the chapter says that there were over a million
soldiers in 30 countries including Greenland, because the polar bears were
definitely a serious threat to our national security (sarcasm), and we have
also had a bunch of roles in different alliances and treaties. Overall, it
seems that we just went way overboard on trying to defend ourselves having
soldiers all over the world and building even bigger bombs than the Atom bombs
dropped in Japan. Maybe at the time all
these precautions seemed necessary but looking back it’s hard to justify the
need for all those things looking at how things turned out because of our
actions then, but then again hindsight is pretty much always 20/20. A lot of
times in history the cold war was a scary time in America because of
McCarthyism and the Red Scare and we think that we had the worst of it.
However, when you look at Eastern Europe they had it a lot worse than we did.
The Russian people themselves were victims of relentless propaganda and the
Sovets even had to go into their supposed allies’ counties to put down
resistance groups which really says a lot about the freedom of choice Eastern
Europe had under the communist bloc during the Cold War. Overall, the cold war
was a really accurate name for this time period as the relationships between
countries and communication between governments and people were extremely cold;
figuratively of course.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)